Get the search results hurting you off page one

Sometimes, depending on what the content is and where it lives. Search results pointing at content that breaches a platform policy (privacy, NCII, doxxing, defamation, impersonation, harassment) often have removal pathways. Public records, news coverage that's factually accurate, and content where no policy grounds exist usually cannot be removed at the source — for those, the path is search suppression. The free assessment tells you which of your specific results sit in which bucket.

Often workable. People-search aggregators (whitepages, spokeo-style sites, broker pages) have opt-out pathways under various privacy frameworks, and Google has a dedicated removal pathway for personally identifying information surfacing in search. We work both: opt-out at the source where available, Google's own removal tool where the content meets their criteria, and search suppression as a backstop.

Court records themselves can't be removed at the source — they're public records under Australian law and that's by design. What we can address is their visibility in branded search results: build a stronger footprint of accurate content under your name so the court-record page no longer dominates page one. Where coverage of the matter (news articles, commentary) exists, those may have separate pathways depending on the facts.

Realistic timeline is 3 to 12 months depending on how entrenched the existing results are, how many queries we're working, and which pathways the content allows. Some platform removals land in weeks. Search suppression on competitive queries takes longer. The free assessment gives you an honest read on timeline before you commit.

Common with wire-syndicated coverage or aggregator scraping. Each site has its own removal pathway and policy. We work them in parallel rather than serially, and at the same time build search suppression on the queries that surface the cluster — pushing the visible copies off page one even where the long tail of replicated pages stays online.

Defamatory or false content posted by a competitor often has legitimate removal grounds (defamation, Australian Consumer Law misleading-conduct provisions, platform policies on impersonation and review fraud). We coordinate the platform-side work and, where legal grounds exist, work alongside your nominated counsel on takedown notices. We don't offer review-removal as a productised service — where reviews are the issue, suppression on branded queries is usually the workable path.